COMMANDERS SITUATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & COMMON OPERATIONAL PICTURE
Assume
an area of operations AO or a battlespace where a Bde is deployed to
conduct military operations.The various commands right from the topmost
echelon down to the platoon commander are in their own way engaged in
the battle , with the higher Commands more involved in decision cycle
planning and execution whereas the lower and subordinate tactical units
engaged in combat operations.The battles of today are characterized by
nonlinear distributed warfare attributes in a highly fluid condition
with more and more asymmetric type enemies and enemy TTPs.But be it
conventional or asymmetric warfare , the entire operation is composed
of seemingly disparate and distributed combat operations by the various
units throughout the battlespace.It becomes increasingly difficult to
keep track of all such unit tactical operations in an atmosphere which
is highly fluidic in tempo.The top echelon command will not have the
time to focus on ground level tactical ops.The standard COP refers to a
single,combined,graphical, visual display of the battlespace
environment , foces , and actions portrayed in near real time on an
operation scale rather than the broader strategic level to aid the
situational development anawareness of the Bde command headquarters and
down through to the lowest tactical command so that these HQs can
ensure that the proper /currect information is presented to the
commander ..with every commander at every level viewing the identical
graphical display.In this manner collaborative planning and
synchronized execution of actions is achieved and the entire system
acts as a single unit , coherent unit driven by the situational
awareness generated.
So far so good.
We can along these same lines create an intelligence common operational
picture ICOP so that every command level can share , synchronize and
integrate the intelligence products , intelligence feeds from tactical
operation centers supporting multiple companies,force protection
intelligence , security products like vulnerability assessment and
threart assessment, attack and IED frequency distributions and profiles
, special operations forces and R&S debriefs and intelligence
reports from the CI element attached to the teams and finally OSINT
which actually accounts for more than 90% of our intelligence inputa
though rarely realized.
If we can have a combined tabbed representation of all the above in
portal form on the desk of the command intelligence staff at every
level , with continuous updating by operators in the command analysis
section , in the TOCs and if we can ensure that all company and
platoons with organic intelligence capability (pl refer to my project
ARMY XXII) are commanded and controlled by the ''created'' Bn Int HQ
properly and technically then the 2 intelligence analysts can ''push''
intelligence discipline-specific (HUMINT , SIGINT , Tactical
questioning by trained inf soldiers , DOCEX , CEE etc) information
efficiently to their TOCs..with all the TOC forming a TOC
NET...connected with every command int section through secure
communication lines ..all the connected command staff computers forming
a LAN at every command level..all these LAN networks being connected to
form a WAN network comprising the entire Brigade ..then we can achieve
the ICOP , with the result that situational awareness is heightened
considerably as accurate , specific and timely intelligence is the
foundation of information warfare...if we have to get that comnpetitive
edge over our enemy and more importantly avert surprise.
Further this tabbed display will be in near real time.Every command int
staff and even the soldier on the ground belonging to the created (My
project ARMY XXII) can easily access the display..common at every level
, and retreive information of immediate need--this ''intelligence
reach'' is extremely important for tactical missions but hardly do
soldiers on the ground can access timely information or combat
intelligence.Again this portal can facilitate updating of information
through intelligence gathered by soldiers and fed into the system by
simply entering the information in a ''contact us'' message form
interface.
MILITARY
OPS MAP CREATED BY KESHAV.THIS IS A MODEL WHERE THE BRIGADE COMPONENTS
(Bn , Coy) are engaged in Tactical Ops in a distributed non-linear
battlespace--mostly mountaneous terrain..N.E.Mountain Divisions are
Headquartered as shown which are not correct in position , are included
here only for the sake of modelling.This ops map does not represent any
battlespace in real - its included here to explain the concept of COP
with the help of TOCs and Networking.
The TOC's at Bn level collect all the HUMINT/SIGINT and R&S
information.These are analysed and reports generated.These reports are
shared horizontally amongst all the TOCs and sent upwards to the
Brigade TOC concerned.All the Brigade TOCs share the information
amongst themselves and submit a distilled combined and condensed report
to the Bde Cdr.All the Bde Cdr's forward the reports to the DIV Int
Staff through their Int Staff Officers.The DIV Intelligence Staff which
in turn studies the reports and places the INTSUM , INT ESTMATE and CI
ESTIMATE to the DIV Cdr.
BELOW IS THE SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMMING OF THE ''AT A GLANCE'' PICTURE OF
THE INTELLIGENCE SITUATION AT DIV , Bde & Bn levels ; The
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Report;
Threat/Vulnerability Assessments;the Force Protection Intel and FPCON
Reports , the Intelligence Products brief ; the insurgent IED/Attack
profiles ; the Deconfliction Reports and After Action Reviews. |
COP MAIN COMMON REPRESENTATION - ALL ECHELONS
<<For meaning of above terms please go here >> |
Designed for INDIAN ARMY by Keshav Mazumdar Associate
Degree Military Sc(Rochville Univ USA) Dip Criminology (UK) Sr Vice
President ATAB USA Advisor RIEAS Grece Advisor European Intelligence
Academy Greece Admn College of Asian Studies Admn ATAB WAR College USA
CAS CMAS ATO CPO CRC FNWC