TACTICAL INT CAPABILITY
INT SUPPORT TO Coy
Keshav Mazumdar ATO
The targeting process is the culmination of another involved
process, beginning from sensor
collection activities, sent higher up to the intelligence section
where collation, analysis is done,
the finished intelligence product now being routed for
dissemination to the targeting platform.
Information flow is from down-up preceded by request for
information from the troop level. All
this entails time and intelligence is perishable, in that it is
needed to be not only accurate and
specific but also timely. To avoid this time delay or to put it
this way: to reduce the time between
sensor collection to targeting, we need to distill the targeting
process down to the company or
platoon level. If collation and analysis can be pushed down to
that level, a great deal of
enhancement in situational awareness and operational efficiency
would result. One of the most
effective of these was the distillation of the targeting process
into a Troop/Company-level tool.
We can have a Company intelligence support cell which will help in
the creation of Company
and platoon level intelligence teams or grant assistance to units
who have no organic intelligence
capability.
The squads or platoons at ground level usually accost the enemy in
rapidly changing
environments with the element of surprise against them. In such
situations the soldiers have to
adapt real fast and there is no time for sending information
requests to Bn Intelligence officer or
higher up and waiting for intelligence...timely specific and
accurate intelligence that is. Here
‘’timely intelligence’’ is crucial. Troops on most occasions find themselves
operating unilaterally
against insurgents conducting IDF, DF and IED attacks and have to
adapt quickly. It is here that
the intermediate level Company intelligence support cell can help
by creating a squad targeting
process by supporting the squads with raw operational intelligence
by fielding its HUMINT and
CI assets with the squad itself. Later it will be detailed how the
HUMINT and CI enabled
platoons are formed with the CLIC in the lead.
In the absence of the CLIC the usual intelligence summary report
briefed to the Bn and Bde
commanders omits the ground critical information need of the
squad/platoon. The picture usually
presented takes into account the operational success/failures as a
whole and dwells on the
priority intelligence requirements, not the immediate intelligence
requirements of the tactical unit
on the ground involved in combat. But if we have the CLIC setup,
then the CLIC can increase
the situational awareness at higher levels by sending in intelligence
reports through the lens of
the squad firefight.
SIGINT resources required to conduct effective personality-centric
targeting are not available at
the Company or Troop level.
All the information collected at the troops level is exploited
where proper categorization and
collation is executed. It is at the exploitation stage that the
soldiers work is evaluated and decided
who needs further training to collect information properly.
Because the correct manner of
collection of information is very important at the troop level. It
must be duly ensured that he has
properly conducted tactical exploitation of the area , of the
captured materials, and of the human
terrain. It must be seen to it that his knowledge of tactical
questioning is thorough. All these
performance indexes are reflected when the platoon intelligence
unit or company intelligence
unit submits their intelligence reports. This exploitation phase
will require a great deal of
administrative functions to assess the soldier’s capability and
also to assist in the collation of all
collected information. Although at this phase nothing strong is
produced against the insurgents,
but further operations tend to be driven with the collected
intelligence. This is where the Bn
Intelligence officer or the Company intelligence officer decides
on the technical control aspects
of the collection being done by line soldiers and ensuring that
they adhere to it now and in the
future.
It can very well be that the projecting intelligence capability
option is used where it is not
practicable for having own intelligence unit. There can be the
Company intelligence support
unit/s, modular and available to all the Companies operating in
the area of operations. These
units can for example debrief returning patrols of the company.
Returning patrols are a very
important source of intelligence—this fact should be understood
clearly. Now just coming and
telling the Platoon section headquarters or the Company
headquarters intelligence officer what
information they have will not suffice the purpose. This
information needs to be sent to higher
echelons and that too systematically after being entered into the
Company’s knowledge
management system, collated and analyzed. It is not that difficult
as a computer system can be
set up and today dozens of map tracking or link analysis softwares
are available together with
database management system software for small units.
The debriefs of the patrols should include what they have observed
about the local population –
any changes from earlier situations perhaps?—pictures taken, any
information to satisfy the units
intelligence requirements, any engagements with the enemy and if
so where, any information
from any civilian upon being questioned etc etc.
One thing that can and should be incorporated in a COIN
environment is the ground level or
company level intelligence units biometric collection and
exploitation capability. If the soldiers
can properly take DNA samples from members of the population
enrolled in a DNA collection
scheme and then all biometric information recorded in the
database, in any future case of
insurgent attacks all biometric evidence can then be
cross-referenced with that contained in the
database , thus if there are matches insurgent personalities get
i9dentified , driving further
operations , kinetic or arrest and prosecution.
Analyze
In this phase the Company intelligence support teams will study
all information submitted by
patrols (HUMINT reports), by special forces who went on raids , by
forces returning from
encounters with captured material and spot intelligence from EPWs
etc , sort them and then
study how they are reflected in earlier Bde or Bn intelligence
summaries , to find out common
information. This step is different than most intelligence
analysis steps generally used in INDIAs
COIN operations. We have cases like Dantewada or several cases of
ambush. If the company
intelligence support teams find that there exist past reports of
ambushes and IED activity similar
to the current patrols debrief and located in or near specific
areas of the area of operations then a
pattern emerges , indicating for example insurgent concentration
points or say the terrain in
these areas are conducive for ambush or IED placement. Or it can
also mean that whenever our
forces are visiting those areas they are being ambushed or IEDed
so that they do not reach
certain areas in close proximity which could be the insurgents
operational headquarters or
anything important for their operations or maybe containing
population who are sympathetic to
their cause, and whose questioning or area search may yield
intelligence vital to the success of
the forces and detrimental to the insurgents. Hence from the force
protection perspective, finding
reflections in intelligence summaries of higher headquarters is
something the company
intelligence unit gives high importance. Reflections will also
help the Commander to make an
idea about the effectiveness of patrols as any desirable effect on
the insurgents, like capture, or
increased movements or a spike in the behavior of certain
elements/groups in the local
population paves the way for further patrolling and enabling the
Commander to act more
decisively.
Disseminate
This phase is perhaps the most difficult one and also the most
important one in that after the
present company/s toil for a year collecting and maintaining
intelligence information, relief
troops need to be filled in with that information properly and it
is vitally important that the Bn,
company and lower levels need to be disseminated all pertinent
intelligence in time , maintaining
specificity , accuracy and timeliness. Thus dissemination is the
most important part of the
targeting process and how that information is utilized. The relief
units coming in and being
disseminated properly enables continuity in operations. Any break
in this continuity is an
advantage for the insurgents in that they get time to regroup etc
while the relief company’s are
consolidating or trying to consolidate their position with little
information from the departing
units.
During dissemination the usual recourse is to pinpoint grid
locations on a map where caches are
located , or have been found and where encounters have been
experienced or probable areas for
encounter. This is not the correct way. Efforts should be made
with the help of software or
reasoning that ‘’linkages’’ are established between these points.
So that a larger picture of the
area of operations results with interconnecting nodes.Say we have
a local village panchayats
house located a few blocks away from a madrasa which information
collected shows it to be a
school for insurgents , being indoctrinated at night. Further some
patrols have pointed out that in
other areas around the madrasa there have been few arrests at
evening times by the local police.
Thus we find layers of intelligence makes the entire area involving
the mosque and the adjoining
areas very important from the security point of view. Then one
fine day on doubt the panchayat
leader was detained for an hour. Keeping the security importance
of the madrasa in
perspective—it as the threat—then we can extrapolate further and
associate the panchayat leader
with the madrasa activities and all activities near the madrasa
under the scanner (the panchayat
leader is a locally powerful man and happenings in a madrasa near
his place of living cannot
happen without his knowledge--#assumption) and the nodes are thus
portrayed by connecting all
the dots , here two of them being the leaders house and the
madrasa.