Counter Intelligence
- Counterintelligence Planning
Planning of Tactical Operations,
the Critical Component of Overall CI Planning
- Planning of tactical operations includes CI planning.
- This is an extremely important component of the overall planning.
- As CI/HUMINT operations require much more time than other
intelligence disciplines these are looked into at the very beginning of
tactical operations planning by the Commander or Team Leader.
- It is the the CI staff officer who assists in the planning.
- He may further be joined by the Human exploitation team officer in charge and the CI second in command
C.I. Planning
- Requirement:
- CI planning is required as it aids the Commander in situation
development. The commander can asses security vulnerabilities, get an
estimate of the threat intelligence and force protection factors. It
also helps in the overall formulation of intelligence and force
protection operations. During planning overall intelligence effort
certain intelligence disciplines like HUMINT have close ties with
CI—hence the need for clear CI planning.
CI and HUMINT Integrated
- CI activities and HUMINT operations need to be integrated and
deconflicted as both have similar methodology , CI focusing on threat
intelligence and countering it while HUMINT focusing on collecting
information about the enemy.
Human Exploitation
- Effective human exploitation (such as sources, refugees, EPW etc)
such as using interrogation/translation to extract information of
intelligence value from EPWs.
CI Information Provided to Commander
- During the planning phase of tactical operations CI information is
made available to the Commander and countermeasures suggested.
- The commanders benefit from CI information given at this phase
because it helps to formulate tactical plans and because CI/HUMINT
operations, by their very nature, generally require
- more time than other intelligence disciplines to yield substantive results.
CI Determines Vulnerabilities
- CI looks outside-in and hence the CI staff officer participating in
the planning phase advises the Commander on the vulnerabilities which
enemy intelligence may target.
CI Staff Officer Provides Direction
- The commander formulates an all-source intelligence collection plan to which the CI staff officer contributes by:
- a)Assisting in giving direction to the planning by focusing on the
enemy's intelligence, subversion, terrorism and sabotage capabilities.
- b)Making it sure by coordinating with the intelligence operations
officer and collection manager who are also present in the planning
that the collection requirements levied on the CI/HUMINT operatives are
in tune with the Commanders intelligence requirements and that the CI
elements have the capability to pursue the activities thus helping the
overall collection plan by inserting such realistic factors.
Planning the Activity
- The CI Staff officer along with the help of the CI/HUMINT Company
commander directs the collection effort—collection of intelligence
pertaining to the enemies intelligence, terrorist, subversive, and
sabotage capabilities, oversees the production of the said
intelligence, ensures the timely dissemination to higher-ups and the
units on the ground and finally recommends and monitors CI measures
throughout the Command.
- Throughout he is assisted by the Officer in charge of the Collection Depot and the Operations Staff.
CI Planning Considerations
- Key considerations in planning CI operations include:
- Determine clearly the Area of Ops and the Area of Interest. The
concept of operations, the command/support relationships between
HUMINT, CI and Reconnaissance units.
- What are the intelligence requirements which the supporting CI units have been tasked with?
- What are the priority intelligence requirements, whether it’s the
enemy ground/air ops, target battle damage assessment or future
intentions of the enemy?
- What is the MAGTF concept of operations, task organization, main and supporting efforts?
Enemy Considerations
- Intelligence operations are designed to know as much as possible about the enemy. Key points are:
- What are the threat forces characteristics? Are they guerilla type
or do they belong to terrorist, insurgent organizations? Is there any
sabotage group involved? Are there any enemy HUMINT/CI personnel? Are
we handling an enemy with the forces structured on conventional lines
or is it they are loose asymmetric cells? What are their centers of
gravity and vulnerable nodes? Their sizes, composition, TTPs?
Who are their Commanders and key leaders?
- The it C2 nodes (Command and Control Junction node) and associated vulnerabilities?
- What are the TTPs of its C2 and CIS systems? What is the CI structure and what are their CI measures to prevent CI exploitation?
- Who are the known enemy personnel engaged in intelligence, terrorist, sabotage, insurgency , CI or security activities?
- Who supports them /sympathizes with them from among the political/administration or population domains?
Information on Enemy Installations
- What are the key physical facilities, including installations used by the enemy?
- What are the key communications, media, chemical, biological, utilities, and political installations and facilities?
- Which political parties, student groups, political/national figures
and student leaders support the cause of the enemy and are hostile to
our country?
Standard Intelligence Cycle
- CI planning and execution is conducted in concert with the six phases of the standard intelligence cycle.
- The first phase is planning and direction. It consists of those
activities that identify pertinent intelligence requirements (IR) and
provide the means for satisfying those requirements.
- Intelligence planning and direction is a continuous function and a
command responsibility. The commander directs the intelligence effort;
the intelligence officer manages this effort for the commander based on
the intent, designation of priority intelligence requirements (PIR),
and specific guidance provided during the planning process.
6 Phases of Standard Intel Cycle
- Planning and Direction Functions
- Requirements development
- Requirements management
- Collection management
- Production management
- CI Planning and the Intelligence Cycle
Operations drives intelligence. Intelligence drives operations
- This dynamic is the essence of mission-based intelligence support
and is carried out by flexible and not rigid application of the
intelligence cycle.
- The intelligence cycle is not an end in itself. Every intelligence requirement undergoes processing separately.
- Planning is continuous. As the operations proceed further intelligence requirements surface and older ones are modified.
CI is Decision Planning and Execution Planning.
- Counterintelligence planning is composed of two iterations of the intelligence cycle.
- Decision planning and Execution planning.
Execution Planning
- In the first phase the battle space and threat is determined by
processing basic intelligence and counterintelligence procedures
(collection, collation, analysis of information of intelligence and
counterintelligence value) resulting in the production of intelligence
and CI estimates and the intelligence preparation of the battlefield.
- Using these end products the Commander now goes forth to develop
and select the various COAs. Now the second iteration, via execution
planning takes place.
Cause of Action
- For every COA selected the resulting scenario is studied and the concept of operations determined.
- Keeping the mission in perspective, and based on the concept of
operations, refinement of the intelligence and counterintelligence
variables occur together with a review of the IPB, implementation of
the final intelligence and counterintelligence collection, production
and dissemination plan.
COA Mission Specific Intel
- The end products of which are mission-specific intelligence
products and CI measures for the Commander to integrate with the
concept of operations and conduct mission execution. As execution
proceeds fresh intelligence requirements surface and each requirement
is given unique attention, satisfied so as to ensure smooth mission
execution.